An Examination of Managers' Perspectives on Organizational Democracy
Keywords:
Organizational democracy, managers' perspectives, descriptive analysis, implementation barriers, organizational performance, cultural influencesAbstract
This study aims to explore and analyze managers' perspectives on organizational democracy. A narrative review with a descriptive analysis approach was conducted. Relevant literature was systematically collected from reputable academic databases, including Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, as well as Persian databases like Civilica, Noormags, Magiran, and SID. The review focused on studies published in the last decade (2014-2024) that directly address managers' perspectives on organizational democracy. The selected literature was analyzed to extract and synthesize key themes related to the study's objectives. The review identified four key themes: 1) Managers' understanding of organizational democracy varies significantly, influenced by cultural and organizational contexts. 2) Managers' attitudes toward implementing organizational democracy range from supportive, viewing it as a tool for enhancing performance and employee satisfaction, to skeptical, concerned about potential inefficiencies. 3) The perceived impact of organizational democracy on performance is mixed, with some managers recognizing its benefits in increasing innovation and reducing conflicts, while others highlight challenges like decision-making delays. 4) Resistance to and barriers against adopting organizational democracy were noted, particularly due to concerns over losing control and structural complexities in larger organizations. The study concludes that managers' perspectives on organizational democracy are deeply influenced by organizational culture, previous experiences, and perceived operational efficiency. For successful implementation, it is crucial to address these concerns through targeted training, supportive infrastructure, and adaptive management strategies that align with specific organizational contexts. Further research is recommended to explore the long-term effects of organizational democracy and to develop new theoretical models that better explain the role of managers in this process.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, K., Ahmad, A., Ali, R., & Rehman, R. U. (2019). Organizational Democracy and Employee Outcomes: The
Mediating Role of Organizational Justice. Business Strategy & Development, 2(3), 204-219.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.55
Barattucci, M., Presti, A. L., Bufalino, G., Jønsson, T., Teresi, M., & Pagliaro, S. (2020). Distributed Leadership Agency
and Work Outcomes: Validation of the Italian DLA and Its Relations With Commitment, Trust, and Satisfaction.
Frontiers in psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00512
Barthold, C., Checchi, M., Imas, J. M., & Jones, O. S. (2020). Dissensual Leadership: Rethinking Democratic Leadership
With Jacques Rancière. Organization, 29(4), 673-691. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420961529
Berkovich, I. (2023). Teachers' Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation as Mediators of the Effect of Principals' Perceived
Distributed Leadership on Organizational Learning Capability. International Journal of Educational Management,
(6/7), 1552-1570. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-03-2023-0115
Clarke, M. (2011). Organizational Democracy, Ethics and Leadership: The Mediating Role of Organizational Politics.
Leadership, 7(4), 415-433. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715011416886
Haskasap, E., Saner, T., Eyupoglu, Ş. Z., & Haskasap, C. S. G. (2022). Influence of Organizational Democracy on
Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in Digital Transformation: Mediating Effects of Job Satisfaction and
Organizational Commitment for Smart Services. Sustainability, 15(1), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010452
Hielscher, S., Beckmann, M., & Pies, I. (2014). Participation Versus Consent: Should Corporations Be Run According
to Democratic Principles? Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(4), 533-563. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq2014111919
Raelin, J. A. (2012). Dialogue and Deliberation as Expressions of Democratic Leadership in Participatory Organizational
Change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811211199574
Raelin, J. A. (2014). Imagine There Are No Leaders: Reframing Leadership as Collaborative Agency. Leadership, 12(2),
-2828. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715014558076
Safari, A., Salehzadeh, R., & Ghaziasgar, E. (2018). Exploring the Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational
Democracy. The TQM Journal, 30(1), 74-96. https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-05-2017-0057
Wegge, J., Jeppesen, H.-J., & Weber, W. (2012). Broadening Our Perspective: We Leadership Is Both Less Romantic
and More Democratic. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 418-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-
2012.01472.x
Wegge, J., Jeppesen, H. J., Weber, W., Pearce, C. L., Silva, S. A. d., Pundt, A., Jønsson, T., Wolf, S., Wassenaar, C. L.,
Unterrainer, C., & Piecha, A. (2010). Promoting Work Motivation in Organizations. Journal of Personnel
Psychology, 9(4), 154-171. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000025
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1403 Journal of Technology in Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management (JTESM)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
